Apple's name is related to various incidents of violence in the United States, particularly those described as terrorist attacks, due to a criminal iPhone, which was later classified as a police evidence
It was 2016 when Apple starred in one of the most popular cases for refusing to create backdoor on iOS which will allow the FBI to unlock password protected cell phones to assist with their investigation. But this time in 2020, a similar situation renewed Apple's borders on Scensacola's security and lawsuit, though in this case the manzaneros opted to respond differently.
While both times Apple provided iCloud-backed information to authorities, new reports say Apple abandoned plans to use it. end-to-end encryption for iCloud, apparently because of pressure from the FBI.
The report said Apple had been working on the project more than two years ago, but was canceled after the FBI expressed concern that the company could block your search. On its own, an Apple employee told Reuters that the company "does not want to risk being investigated by government officials for protecting criminals" or ordering them to make previously accessible data unavailable. Government agencies
The the difference between final encryption and encryption It says that for the first time, Apple stores iCloud backups in a way that is installed on Apple's servers. If required by law, the company must provide iCloud data, including translation key.
For its part through end-to-end encryption avoid rediscovering passwords, so if you forget it, you lose all access to personal information such as your photo library. What do you think of Apple's decisions? Share a comment!
