Although Microsoft intends to continue call-of-duty In addition to the current deal with Activision, which is also available on the PlayStation platform, Sony said the offer was “inadequate on many levels.”
The proposal was made privately by the two companies, but PlayStation CEO Jim Ryan expressed his feelings on the matter after Xbox chief Phil Spencer discussed it publicly. It’s the latest in a string of events following Microsoft’s decision to buy Activision Blizzard for $69 billion, which is now awaiting regulatory approval.
In a statement to GamesIndustry.biz, Ryan explained that Microsoft’s offer did not take into account the impact on PlayStation players. Earlier this month, Spencer opened up about Microsoft’s assurances in a review for The Verge, referring to a January written promise that Call of Duty would remain on the PlayStation “for at least a few more years than the current Sony contract. year”.
While Spencer called it “a proposal that goes well beyond typical gaming industry agreements,” Ryan disagreed.
“I’m not going to comment on private business discussions as I understand them, but I feel the need to get straight to the point because Phil Spencer brought it to the public forum,” Ryan told GamesIndustry.biz.
“Microsoft is only proposing that Call of Duty will remain on PlayStation for three years after the current agreement between Activision and Sony ends.
“Nearly 20 years after Call of Duty launched on PlayStation, their proposal was inadequate on many levels and did not take into account the impact on our gamers. We want to ensure that PlayStation gamers continue to have the highest quality Call of Duty ” experience, and Microsoft’s proposal undermines that principle.”
While Microsoft is unlikely to remove Call of Duty from the PlayStation, the company has made it clear that it intends to bring Activision Blizzard games to Game Pass, including Call of Duty. This may be the reason why Sony is not happy with Microsoft’s promise.