Whenever we talk about computers, we think about the most powerful solutions possible within our budget. In game form, they created the worst possible computer, whose performance is really mediocre. This system was created by PC World and has Less than 1% of Powerful from a core of Intel Core i9-13900K processor.
What is always sought after is to get the best performance out of a computer. Therefore, always within the framework of a budget, you will look for the combination of components that will give you the best result. Here, it is precisely the opposite that has been sought, a material combination that generates the worst possible result.
They create the worst computer in the world
This system was created by fellow PC World members with special guest Dr. Ian Cutress. You may not know Curess, but among other things, you were the head of Anandtech and worked for Apple as an engineer.
The system is a massive Frankenstein with a pretty crazy setup. To begin with, the system is based on a dell computer quite old that uses a motherboard with a BTX design, which is no longer used. makes use of a Intel Celeron D 326 processor, a very old processor that, scared of colors, has only one core. was not specified amount of RAM, but they must not exceed 2 GB.
Said processor lacks integrated graphics and in a display of madness they installed a AMD Radeon FuryX. The graphics don’t fit into the chassis so they used an extension cable NZXT riser to connect it.
Following the craze, they used an old 160 GB mechanical hard drive ability. The system is powered by a fGigabyte P750GM power supply. Certain power supplies which were defective and which also literally exploded.
Is there something missing from this monstrosity? Well, we have to install the worst operating system in history, which is Windows Vista Ultimate. A combination of monstrous elements which, in Cinebench R15 only reached b. The lowest record was set by Ian Cutress, set at 17 points.
Let’s take that into perspective and it’s that this processor doesn’t even reach 1% of the power of the Core i9-13900K in Cinebench R23, which is approximately 2,300 points. The Core i3-12100 in a single core in Cinebench R23 offers 1,658 stitches. To say that it is not currently used for Cinebench R15 benchmarks, as it has been replaced by a more modern version.
Ok, but what’s the point?
Surely you want to have an explanation of why you are looking for the PC with the worst performance. The truth is that there is no logical explanation for these tests, it’s just for fun. Just as it’s fun to push your computer’s components to the limit, it’s also fun to try to achieve the worst result.
In reality, it is much more complicated to obtain the worst result in a benchmark of all time, than the best. The reason is that you have to look for very old components (the processor used is 18 years old) and which allow you to run the test software.
You would think, because I’m using a 25-30 year old computer, but maybe I can’t run Cinebench R15. We must bear in mind that there is a minimum hardware configuration required to be able to move software.
