PayDay 3 is a flop, the fault of a well-known competitor

oriXone

PayDay 3 is a flop, the fault of a well-known competitor

competitor, fault, flop, Payday, Wellknown

Despite its qualities, PayDay 3 is struggling to find its audience and the most frustrating thing is that this is partly due to a well-known competitor. And of course, this hurts the studio. We’ll explain everything to you.

Payday 3 Even a year after its release, it failed to attract as many players as expected. Payday 2released ten years ago, remains as popular as ever, and the sequel can hardly keep up. Players continue to prefer the experience offered by Payday 2and this situation puts Starbreeze in a tricky position.

PayDay 3 is a flop

In view of this lack of success, the creative director of Payday 3Miodrag Kovačevićas, has decided to leave his position. He will now focus on other aspects of the game and make way for Andreas Häll Penninger and Almir Listo, who will continue the project. Starbreeze confirmed this reshuffle in a press release published on X (formerly Twitter). This change could be an attempt to breathe new life into the third game, which it desperately needs.

The numbers speak for themselves: In August Payday 3 has only gathered an average of 844 players on Steam. During this time, Payday 2 still had an average of 15,508 players. Even though this number has dropped compared to previous months, it remains impressive for a game released in 2013. This player loyalty clearly shows that the episode 2 continues to seduce, while Payday 3 seems to have difficulty finding its audience.

An uncertain future?

Despite the introduction of an offline mode in Payday 3However, many players remain skeptical, especially because an internet connection will still be required. For those who were hoping for a more flexible experience, these decisions may seem restrictive.

When you think about it, it’s easy to wonder if it wouldn’t have been better to focus on Starbreeze Payday 2a game that, despite its age, still attracts thousands of players. This might have made it possible to continue improving on a formula that works, rather than focusing on a sequel that struggles to convince.

Source: Twitter

Leave a Comment