< /p>
Both devices are presented with the same capabilities and capabilities, and relatively affordable retail prices are considered their strengths. If we take for example the currently sold versions, which are 1 TB items, these are their retail prices without offer:
As you can see the price difference between the two is only 20 euros, which should put the Samsung SSD, more expensive, as if it were the best in theory. But is it? Let's examine it.
Compare Crucial MX500 vs Samsung 860 EVO
Samsung 860 EVO | Crucial MX500 | |
---|---|---|
Status | 2,5 ", M.2, mSATA | 2,5 ", M.2 |
Agreement | SATA 3 | SATA 3 |
Power (GB) | 250, 500, 1024, 2048, 4096 | 250, 500, 1000, 2000 |
Ver. Reading | 550 MB / s | 560 MB / s |
Ver. Actions | 520 MB / s | 510 MB / s |
MTBF | Up to 2,400 TBW (4 TB) | Up to 700TBW (2TB) |
Technology | V-NAND | 3D NAND |
Warranty | 5 years | 5 years |
For many manufacturers the speed of literacy may vary depending on the capacity, but it is not the case for both SSDs so it comes down to us that you were not even painted with the ability to compare with technology. In this case, the Crued & # 39; s SSD is slightly higher depending on the speed of reading, but that same advantage that Samsung takes in this area has been taken by Samsung in writing, so in terms of performance we can say that by binding.
When Samsung uses a limited profit depending on the maximum we offer, because the Crucial MX500 is only available at up to 2 TB capacity at a time. Samsung 860 EVO is powered by up to 4TB capabilities, twice. In terms of durability, the Samsung SSD is leading as well, which thanks to its V-NAND technology offers unprecedented stability, ideally both warranty is supported for 5 years
We will analyze technologies that support both SSDs.
Crucial MX500
- Powerful typing speed.
- Nundund Independent Array (RAIN).
- Adjustable thermal protection.
- Combined energy absorption.
- Device hibernation support (DevS sleep).
- Active garbage collection.
- TRIM support.
- Authentication and Reporting Technology (S.M.A.R.T.).
- Error correction code (ECC).
- An algorithm for multi-dimensional data.
Samsung 860 EVO
- TurboWrite's clever technology.
- Error correction code (ECC).
- Data integrity algorithm.
- Active garbage collection.
- TRIM support.
- 1 GB of storage.
- DevS sleep.
- Encryption for AES 256 bit, TCG Opal and IEEE 1667.
Once again we find that both SSDs are actually members of the technology. Crucial CRD takes advantage of the built-in power loss functionality, but it is something Samsung's SSD also has, although it does not show up as it has 1 GB of storage, safely protecting data in case of power loss.
Which SSD is better?
In this technical comparison the Crucial MX500 vs Samsung 860 EVO SSD has seen that both are actually quite similar. If we have to choose one of these two models and pay attention to 20 euros of price variations for the 1 TB models, we would have chosen Samsung, as it is a more modern model and has a much greater durability than the Crotal, though this is not necessarily a brief one-off.
In any case, the Crucial MX500 is still an excellent SSD that is very efficient and reliable, so if you are short on budget and are skeptical of these, though we chose the Samsung model do not doubt it because the Crucial is also highly recommended.
Table of Contents