Indeed, since AMD released the first generation AMD Ryzen processors They never stopped receiving market share, because even though in some cases they were behind Intel's performance, all the time it provided a better user option due to its performance / price tag, with special attention to the number of nuclei.
Knowing this, Intel has had to replace batteries in the tenth generation of Core processors, called Comet Lake-S, where they will provide different processors as a spear in their Core i7 and Core i5 ranges, in this case 8-core and 16-thread processors and 6-core and 12-thread processors respectively, so HyperThreading is also available on the Core i5 list.
Intel Core i7-10700K and Core i 5-10600K, spear
Let's start by talking about a processor that will lead the Core i7 range for this next generation Intel. The Core i7-10700K
On the other hand we have Core i5-10600K, a processor that will be in the cores 6 cores and 12 processors with 12 MB total storage and a TDP of 125 watts. Its operating speed will be 4.1 GHz base, with Boost mode of 4.8 GHz on single base and 4.5 GHz on all. Its launch price is expected to range from $ 220 to $ 270.
If you look, this processor will be a little faster than the 8th generation Core, the Core i7-8700K, but being a Core i5 and higher consumption, while the 10700K will be a faster version than the current Core i9- 9900K and $ 500 (100-150 more expensive than you will sell).
In fact, Intel could decide give too much power this generation is following in the footsteps of AMD and preventing them from continuing to consume market share.
Leave the AMD Ryzen behind, at least on the Geekbench
Right now this 10th generation of Intel researchers will have more to show, but the first leaky benchmarks are more promising for the company compared to AMD Ryzen executives currently in charge of the market. This is a filtered function:
This data separately may not tell you much, so we'll put it into perspective to buy with the ones obtained by AMD's most popular processors and the data we have so far in the new generation of Intel.
| GeekBench V4 Core Core | GeekBench V4 Multi Core | |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-10900KF | 6287 | 39103 |
| Intel Core i7-10700K | 6018 | 34221 |
| Intel Core i5-10600K | 6081 | 28673 |
| Intel Core i5-10600KF | 6070 | 28541 |
| AMD Ryzen 7 3800X | 5800 | 35000 |
| AMD Ryzen 7 3700X | 5700 | 34000 |
| AMD Ryzen 5 3600X | 5700 | 28400 |
| AMD Ryzen 5 3600 | 5500 | 27600 |
If you look at it, in this benchmark one performance seat is retained by the Core i7-10700K, but both the Core i9-10900KF and the Ryzen 7 3800X continue to surpass the multi-core performance. We cannot say that the Core i7-10700K beat the AMD Ryzen – at least not all – but that single-source operation predicts that the final version of the processor can do just that.
We'll see what happens if the market operators are already in the market and we know their performance in more locations than GeekBench, but the good news is that Intel is able to reach AMD with these goals since, as it did before but back, the competition is very good.
