As we've been saying for years, One of the worst things about Android is the large and often overlapping division. The presence of thousands and thousands of mobile phones around the world, with their unique hardware, with different layers of customization and, most of all, with their different versions of Android, is a difficult thing to pull off. In this sense we cannot deny that iOS is beating Google's operating system in defeat. That's what should be such an open platform, for good and for bad.
In any case, we have always protected that when you buy a new mobile phone, in addition to looking at technical details, It is important to bet on products that reinvent their facilities. It is useless to spend money if the terminal cannot be updated or if within a few months it will stop support. That is why it is so tempting to spend so much money and buy a phone that we know it will get the right updates and security clips.
The reason is simple. A non-renewable telephone that does not meet its security standards is a canon device for cybercrime. This is alerted by a recent study done (Consumer magazine What? (Http://press.which.co.uk/whichpressreleases/void-android-more-than-one-billion-android-devices-at-risk-of-and- attack /) warns of the danger that millions of Android users are running today by having an outdated Android phone.
More than a billion Android devices are at risk of cracking
As long as your Android 2.3.7 device continues to work on phone and email reading, you should not continue to use it. As we learn from the text of this study and based on the small and small information provided by Google, over 40% of Android users have a phone with Android version 6.0 or higher. That is, in 2020 we continue to use versions such as Mashmallow (2015), Lollipop (2014), KitKat (2013), Jellybean (2012), Ice Cream Sandwich (2011) and Gingerbread (2010). Of course, none of these phones have received any k ind of update or patch for security since last year 2019.
I mean more than one billion Android phones are at risk of being invented, or anything similar, 2 on 5 Android devices. Obviously no one but the actual user should be blamed for continuing to use the old terminal but we cannot forget that many have been discounts used by brands that once sold, never received a review.
All of this should make us think a few things. The first of the products should be more transparent with their phones and the updates they will receive. On the other hand, consumers should be more careful about this feature and stop using outdated devices. Not surprisingly, if we complain that companies like Google or Apple should check us out, Why use old devices?
Keep in mind that Android and especially its app store are the latest news (good looks for most programs with malware) (https://iGamesNews.com/noticias/apps-android/aplicaciones-android-malware-lista9). The latest versions of Android can protect us from these dangers but old ones do not so it's important to stop using these devices as soon as possible. And if you don't want to have problems you know, bet on Google Pixel and you'll have a guaranteed review.
Follow ANDRO4ALL