The Federal Communications Commission, the US telecommunications agency, recently denied that the iPhone and other terminals exceeded the radiation limit Radio frequency allowed This was reported in a study recently published on its website and said the same for MacRumors. According to this statement, the controversy that broke out in the summer ends after a study released by the Chicago Tribune.
A very common frequency of radiation
All sample stations analyzed by the FCC laboratory, which are owned and purchased by the FCC, produce a 1-g average dose at SAR values below the 1m6 W / kg limit defined by the FCC regulations. Thus, all device samples comply with the RF radiation exposure limits of the normal / uncontrolled SAR values of 1.6 W / kg, and these tests showed no evidence of non-compliance. at the highest exposure of the FCC radio standards.
These are the conclusions reached by the FCC as a result of its study. In its presentation, the agency points out that it is an analysis arises as a result of a resignation made by the Chicago Tribune August 21, 2019. That the media alleges that a series of terminals did not comply with goals was a "milestone" for the organization, which is why the analysis of the same participating institutions began.
In particular, the following types:
- Apple iPhone 7, iPhone X and iPhone XS.
- Live 5 Mini from Blu Products.
- Moto e5 Play, Moto G6 Play by Motorola.
- Samsung Galaxy S9 and Galaxy J3.
The tests were done at the same terminals that Tribune was testing at the time. And as we can see, the results leave no doubt: All devices are subject to radiation regulation radio frequency.
A claim dismissed by Apple from the beginning
Although Apple did not first introduce itself in a study by the Chicago Tribune, yes he left these statements shortly after the news broke:
All iPhone models, including 7, are fully certified by the FCC and other countries where the iPhone is sold. After a thorough review of the trial by The Chicago Tribune, we confirm that we comply with all limited exposure guidelines and restrictions.
At that time, all the terminals analyzed in the study received results that were more than what was officially approved. Which shows that it's proof they can be done wrong. Something the company said about Copertino. Although few take this consideration seriously at the time, the reality is that it takes a long time to repeat the tests to be able to fully deny them.
In particular, the FCC It took about four months repeat the test for all the terminals involved.
