Cillian Murphy as Robert Oppenheimer doesn’t have to look sad if Nolan’s bombast film doesn’t win a VFX Oscar, does he? (iama_sing/Adobe Stock)
The film “Oppenheimer” by Christopher Nolan did not make it into the final selection for the Oscar nominations in the “Visual Effects” category, reports the industry journal Variety.
Film fans are now gathering on Twitter (now X) to express their displeasure with the decision.
What is the reaction of the fans to the decision?
There is talk of Oppenheimer and Nolan being “robbed” of an Oscar.
Recommended editorial content
At this point you will find external content from Twitter that complements the article. You can display it and hide it again with one click.
I agree to content from Twitter being shown to me.
Personal data may be transmitted to third-party platforms. Read more about our privacy policy.
reported, these 20 films will make it to the next round of voting:
Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania
Aquaman and the Lost Kingdom
Barbie
The Boys in the Boat
The Creator
Dungeons & Dragons: Honor Among Thieves
Godzilla: Minus One
Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3
Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny
Killers of the Flower Moon
The Marvels
Mission: Impossible – Dead Reckoning Part One
Napoleon
Nyad
Poor Things
Rebel Moon: Part One – A Child of Fire
Society of the Snow
Spider-man: Across the Spider-Verse
Transformers: Rise of the Beasts
Wonka
What could be the reasons why Oppenheimer failed?
Oppenheimer is a film that makes sparing use of visual effects.
In an interview with the Hollywood Reporter Nolan’s VFX supervisor explained how the effects surrounding the detonation of the atomic bomb were created. Several real filmed elements – such as smoke and explosions – were superimposed on the computer.
A simple procedure compared to the makeover given to Harrison Ford in the latest Indiana Jones.
Elsewhere, as special effects supervisor Scott Fisher reports, real explosions were filmed. He says:
“We used four 44-gallon drums of fuel and underneath them some high explosives that set the fuel on fire and threw it into the air.”
Other, less impressive visual effects work consisted of retouching image components that do not fit the 1942 game year.
That’s what the expert says: Oppenheimer hat 200 Visual Effects Shots. For comparison: The first Jurassic Park film was already around 60 VFX-Shots – a film that came out 30 years ago.
And a contemporary blockbuster like Avengers: Infinity has over 2,700 VFX shots, while the second Avatar film has around 3,250 VFX shots.
Sure, the Oscars shouldn’t be about quantity.
Christopher Nolan und Visual Effects: Nolan is a filmmaker who uses computer-made effects is criticalthese are used very sparingly.
This is refreshing in times of completely overworked visual effects houses that have to make last-minute changes for free from major studios. And even on screen, I dare say, we as viewers are all oversaturated with computer effects.
If you want to know how VFX houses are burned out by directors with no understanding of the work of computer artists, all you have to do is look at the story of how the film was made »Life of Pi: Shipwreck with Tiger« by Ang Lee.
The documentary worth seeing »Life After Pi« shows how the legendary VFX house “Rhythm & Hues” gave everything for the production – and as a thank you, it was completely ruined.
That was all ten years ago, but they are also under Marvel Working conditions for VFX artists Apparently it hasn’t necessarily gotten any better.
Are you disappointed if Oppenheimer now comes away empty-handed at the VFX Oscars? In what other categories do you think the Nolan film will win? In other words: What did you think of the film and did you even see it? Which films from screen history do you think had the best special effects? Feel free to write us your opinion on this in the comments.