The debate about Buffs and Nerfs is back on the menu of the Helldivers 2 community, as you're expecting regular courses, which is a regular course – some fresh weapon balance tweaks with yesterday's patch. Like this, a senior figure at Arrowhead has been talking to players about their ideas about change, and CEO Shams Jorjani is the dissonant debater this time.
If you missed the patch 01.002.103 drop, it will fix the LAS-17 Double Edge Scythe and Freedom Warbond servant's GP-31 Ultimatum, which he arrived with “the wrong version of some files”. As part of solving this problem, the arrow also made some balanced adjustments to the two guns.
iGamesNews
As Arrowhead expected in its patch notes, these changes have met with different reactions from the player, as many of the balance changes that have occurred before have done. Different people want different guns and strategies because they play differently, you know the drill.
Therefore, these changes in bilateral and final passes have been considered by some to be too far in terms of the nerf of the equation, and are concerned about both the meaning of the future balance approach to the game (formerly more routes toward Response to player feedback) is aimed at Jorjani, who recently visited the game's Discord server.
In response to a player who announced “please don’t start with the Nerfs again from this year,” Jorjani wrote, “'Last time', like summer – the biggest problem with balance is that it messes up the fantasy. Keep balance very carefully, This does not mean that we will never reduce the effectiveness of things.
“The community sometimes tends to see things that are black or white,” he added. He added that another player praised the studio because if it feels that is essential, you won't be afraid of nerf things, given that It often encounters this kind of offensive, which has never been all nerfs or all lovers”.
Another player answered this statement from Jorjani, accusing the arrow of “dance around Nerfs, confusing the problem because you know if you just level the nerf things, you'll be overturned in terms of those changes. “We succeeded Some major indicators [are] The CEO reiterated how many people play games and players’ satisfaction, “We have zero interest in pushing a specific agenda. But balancing and developing games for a diverse audience is tricky. Sometimes we do it right, sometimes We'll get it wrong and then we'll have the right path.”
He also admitted that the studio did not inform players and that the Wobord weapon was immediately considered “fair” criticism, adding: “I will take this down”.
What do you think so far about these changes to the bilateral scythe and the last-pass atum? Let us know below!
