Usage restrictions: say advanced for PL1 and PL2
Although the Ryzen 7 4800H uses about 45 watts, also known as Nominal TDP, its cTDP is capable of fluctuating between 35W and 54W as a general rule, but AMD allows for higher PPT settings, something to do. by each manufacturer.
In the case of the updated laptop, the PPT has risen to 65 watts in just 5 seconds, indicating that it is a team that is destined to compete with Intel's finest. Knowing this and the fact that your current rival is i9-9980HK (i9-10980HK has not yet been launched), we should consider that there are two ways to read data with this Intel CPU.
First, there are the PL1 and PL2 configurations of 60W and 107W, while Intel's high-end machines allow for maximum power consumption at 120W and 200W prices respectively.
So, the operating battle is also a battle of use and efficiency, since it won't be as good at performance when it consumes three times the power, remember that we're talking about APU gaming laptops, of course, but This still has a much worse battery and cool than a desktop computer.
The Ryzen 7 4800H may not be the same as Intel's 10th generation
If you look at the data in the table above and keep in mind Intel & # 39; s 10th gen processes and their basic layout and frequency, AMD may have trouble dealing with this.
It is true that in the 9th generation, as it seems, the same height and one step forward in certain aspects such as efficiency or performance per watt (they also use their chance at 7 nm, all should be said), but it is also true that AMD competes with older engineering and mode, and yet it doesn't work its competitor with a more advanced product.
One main data under PL2 shows that 9-9980HK wins the Ryzen 7 4800H as good a place as Cinebech, in small yes, but ahead of its 60W / 107W configuration (which is very interesting).
On a multi-core AMD surpasses Intel's current proposal, something to expect from Cinebench, but that on the other hand doesn't benefit from any of the 3D Mark's CPU Score in the Physics category, i.e. gaming.
Even on the X265 HD Benchmark, the Ryzen 7 4800H loses almost one FPS. In summary and as the last graph shows, based on the 100% performance of the i5-9300H, the Ryzen 7 4800H is 73.78% faster than this, while the 9-9980HK is 74.42% higher.
Whatever the similarities, the difference between the two competitors is 0.64%, while the difference in performance on PL1 is 33.33% for AMD (15W).
The battle should focus on the latter on the new Ryzen 9 4900H and 910980HK, where the first one only gets about 200 MHz more compared to the 4800H, while Intel will think it's increased by 300 MHz about its predecessor.
