Depending on the price, the AMD RX 5700 XT is considerably cheaper than the NVIDIA RTX 2070 SUPER, so the first green graphic should be higher by all means, except that this is currently the best option that AMD offers in the gaming segment.
Technical Comparison RX 5700 XT vs RTX 2070 SUPER
We'll start by comparing your technical details.
| AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER | |
|---|---|---|
| Properties | RDNA 1.0 | Exercise |
| Lithographic Process | 7 nm | TSMC 12 nm |
| GPU | Navi 10 XT | TU104-410-A1 |
| Death size | 251 mm2 | 545 mm2 |
| Transistors | 10.3 billion | 13.6 billion |
| SM / CUs | 40 | 40 |
| Shaders | 2560 | 2560 |
| NTUs | 160 | 184 |
| ROPs | 64. | 64. |
| RT Cores | 0 | 40 |
| Censor Cores | 0 | 320 |
| L2 cache | 4096 KB | 4096 KB |
| Basic Mode Case Clock | 1605 MHz | 1605 MHz |
| Increase Clock Mode Clock | 1905 MHz | 1770 MHz |
| VRAM type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| VRAM Clock | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps active) | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps active) |
| Bus | 256 less | 256 less |
| VRAM bandwidth | 448 GB / s | 448 GB / s |
| FP32 functionality | 9.75 TFLOPs | 9,062 TFLOP |
| PCIe type | 4.0 | 3.0 |
| TDP | 225 W | 215 W |
| Food | 8 + 8 pins | 8 + 6 pins |
| NVLink / SLI / Crossfire | CrossFireX | NVLink |
| High temperatures | 95ºC | 87ºC |
| Estimate the price | 449 Euros | 549 Euro |
At first glance, the RTX 2070 SUPER has the highest mortality there's an AMD graph (more than twice as many, actually), which has allowed NVIDIA to integrate over 2.3 billion transistors, something that didn't work to increase the number of CUs or Shaders, because they are the same size on both graphics cards.
Of note is that the NVIDIA graph has 24 TMUs over that of AMD, and it actually includes Tensor Cores and 40 RT Cores, something that does not have AMD graphs, Ray's tracking. And this is an interesting point of interest for NVIDIA's GPU and a good reason to choose it over AMD. But let's look at all the details.
As for performance speed, maximum speed of The AMD GPU is more notable than NVIDIA, and because depending on the VRAM memory of both models the images have been compared (more precisely), it allows the Radeon RX 5700 XT to provide greater power to the FP32 calculation, with a total of 9.75 TFLOPs compared to the 9,062 TFLOPs RTX 2070 SUPER (keep in mind that we use data from the reference charts of both manufacturers).
Basically, these two graphics cards are very similar in terms of technical benefits. Surprisingly, AMD graphics, although with less lithography than NVIDIA (7 vs. 12nm), have higher usage and require more power, but yes, they do offer higher performance. For its part, the RTX 2070 SUPER is essentially the RX 5700 XT because it has Ray Tracing, something that has no AMD graphics and that today can be very valuable with current games.
Now, a little workaround but with Ray Tracing, a 100 dollar difference in their price?
Is it worth paying 100 euros more to have Ray Tracing?
As always, it is. If you are a gamer who loves to keep up-to-date with all the latest games in the latest technology, the answer is yes, it would be worth paying the price difference for having this technology.
Now, if you're a gamer who looks at the game's best performance and gives it the same look, even if your budget is tight, the RX 5700 XT is a better option for you.
Our decision in this regard is not so, they are two similar images whose main difference is that NVIDIA is less efficient but has Ray Tracing, so it will depend on what you want to choose one or the other.
