First of all, the Intel processor has a limited advantage as it is much cheaper, since its price is about 75 euros compared to the 100 euros of AMD processors and, in any case, there is a certain difference that the Ryzen processor can make the balance from its position. . Let's take a look at everything.
Core i3-9100F vs Ryzen 5 1600AF, technical comparison
| Intel Core i3-9100F | AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF | |
|---|---|---|
| Properties | Take it out again at Cofi Lake | AMD Zen + Picasso |
| Part | The desk | The desk |
| Isaac | LGA 1151 | AM4 |
| Death | 140.6 mm2 | 210 mm2 |
| Cores | 4 | 4 |
| Sticks | 4 | 4 |
| Transistors | 4,950 million | |
| L1 cache | 64K each | 128K each |
| L2 cache | 256K per base | 512K per base |
| C3 cache | 6 MB shared | 4 MB shared |
| Frequency of base | 3.6 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| Turbo Frequency | 4.2 GHz | 4.0 GHz |
| TDP | 65 W | 65 W |
| Lithograph | 14 nm ++ | 12nm |
| High temperatures | 100 ºC | 95 ºC |
| Heatsink as usual | Intel OEM | AMD Wraith Silent |
| RAM memory | Up to 64GB DDR4-2400 | Up to 64GB DDR4-2933 |
| Memory configuration | Dual channel | Dual channel |
| PCIe | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| Integrated graphics | No. | Radeon Vega 8 |
| IGPU Frequency | No. | 1250 MHz |
| Get started | The second quarter of the 2019 season | July 2019 |
| Excessive entry | No. | Yes |
We are as we can see in front of two quad-core processors without HyperThreading or SMT, so the number of threads corresponds to the number of cores (4 in this case. Intel processors take some advantages because although they both operate simultaneously on the same basis, i Turbo speed is 200 MHz high to an AMD processor, and with the same TDP.
As for backups, both operating processes vary across levels: the Intel Core i3-9100F has 64K L1 cache, 256K L2 cache, and 6MB shared L3 cache, while the AMD Ryzen 5 processor 1600AF has 128K L1 cache, 512K L2 cache, and 4MB L3 cache. So the Intel processor has 23 cMB more but the L1 and L2 cache. This results in that The AMD processor will be faster with simple, complex tasks, but Intel will benefit from longer performance..
Regarding RAM memory support, here The Lyzen processor takes advantage because it supports much higher speeds as usual, up to DDR4 at 2933 MHz compared to DDR4 at 2400 MHz from the Intel processor, in both cases in dual channel mode.
And now come the benefits of the AMD processor, two: on the other hand, this processor it has a GPU Radeon Vega 8 integrated, which means we won't need to have a graphics card dedicated to the system. The second advantage is that it has an AMD Wraith Silent heatsink in the factory, which is much higher than the Intel OEM that includes the product processor. This means that even though it supports a lower temperature limit, if we decide not to include a third party heatsink with the AMD processor we will have better temperatures
Which of these two processes is best to buy?
As always, it is. Intel's processor is a bit cheaper, but since it doesn't include the GPU it can only be recommended if you intend to purchase separately to buy a graphics card, so its price may increase slightly. The AMD processor, on the other hand, is not only a iGPU but comes from a factory with the best heatsinks that will also save money by not needing to buy a third party heatsink.
Depending on the performance, they are equal or equal, but given the other benefits offered to us by the AMD processor, if they were optional Ryzen 5 1600AF for although it costs more, what it offers is worth it.
