Unless we have very specific needs, most users, when buying a new PC, will use Windows as their main operating system, although any Linux distribution can also be installed in an independent distribution or using ‘a virtual machine, being It is the least recommended. option, at least if we want to get the most out of it.
If for your next computer you plan to use Linux alongside Windows, without using a virtual machine, the processor market is initially reduced to two options: Intel and AMD, however, in reality we can only opt for the solution that AMD offers us, since the performance of the Intel Core Ultra range is far behind AMD’s Ryzen 7 range.
The guys from Phoronix, a site specializing in Linux, carried out a test with the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H processor and the AMZ Ryzen 7840U processor, on two laptops to check which one offers better performance and efficiency, the winner being a slip of ground. , the AMD processor.
Linux on laptops, Intel or AMD?
To carry out the test, they used an Acer laptop equipped with the processor Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, with 16 GB of LPDDR5X RAM, 1 TB of NVMe SSD storage with an integrated graphics card. The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H processor has 16 cores and 22 threads, 24 MB cache and consumption ranging from 28 to 115W.
The hardware used with the AMD processor is from the Framework manufacturer. This computer has the processor AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
In both cases, the latest version of Ubuntu currently available, 23.10, with kernel version 6.7, was used. The latest firmware version available at that time was also used. The guys from Phoronix achieved a total of 370 trials of all kinds, from web browsing, to audio and video editing and coding, to code compilation and content creation using artificial intelligence.
Although we have already discussed the results of these tests above, below we will focus on the results, results which leave the Intel processor in a very bad position. The laptop powered by the AMD Ryzen 7 7840 U processor outperformed the computer powered by the Intel Core Ultra 7 processor in 80% of tests. In terms of processor performance, the AMD model offered 28% higher performance with a Lower power consumption than AMD model. Acer equipment used during testing.
Although Linux is not a widely used operating system, it is striking how Intel leaves this operating system aside, the complete opposite of AMD. If it is true that this manufacturer has had enough time to optimize performance under Linux, it is assumed that Intel is working on this optimization. But, with the results available, what is clear is that if we are looking for a new generation portable computer to work with Linux, the solution that AMD offers us is far superior to that of Intel.
