Intel 10 nm CPUs will not be better than the 22 nm CPU

The Boss

PC

Intel 10 nm CPUs will not be better than the 22 nm CPU

CPU, CPUs, Intel


We pretty much followed everything related to Intel's 10 nm, when some analysts came to predict the fact that the company left that node aside and focused on EUV technology.

The problem as it is, delays separately, is that Intel has invested in both and hopes to put it into a new node, so it should merge with a roadmap to please investors and, in addition, give time to EUV technology and ASML.

Tiger Lake will arrive this year with advances in the lithographic process

intel-ice-lake-cpu "wide =" 1268 "height =" 664 "data-srcset =" https://igamesnews.com/app/uploads-igamesnews.com/2020/03/intel-ice-lake-cpu .jpg 1268w, https://igamesnews.com/app/uploads-igamesnews.com/2020/03/intel-ice-lake-cpu-300x157.jpg 300w, https://igamesnews.com/app/uploads-hardzone .es / 2020/03 / intel-ice-lake-cpu-1024x536.jpg 1024w, https://igamesnews.com/app/uploads-igamesnews.com/2020/03/intel-ice-lake-cpu-768x402. jpg 768w "size =" (max-width: 1268px) 100vw, 1268px "/></p>
</p>
<p>The latest Intel lithographic processes have left the lights and gaps. While 14 nm is much more extended and improved, this does not prove to be a good area in itself.</p>
<p>The advent of this market thought that there were many problems for the company, as the frequency and the internal buses felt that it had reduced the efficiency of the buildings which had to compensate them in some way.</p>
<p>On the other hand, 22 nm was really impressive from their inception and was the last issue to set the tone against AMD. Therefore, Intel CFO compares the statements made at the conference at 10 nm against these two frontlines.</p>
<p>First of all, it means that they have at least 10 SKUs that are ready for this year and that they generally have more than 10 SKUs in other categories, it is understood that they will be Ice Lake-S. In addition, there was talk of Tiger Lake, which will arrive in 2020<strong> 10 nm +</strong>.</p>
<h2>Intel is more reliable than ever: 10 nm isn't a big deal</h2>
<p><img decoding=

What is so shocking and seems to be dropping blocks is that 10 nm is clearly not going to be the best place Intel has. This is surprising because, in large quantities, the increase is really impressive, so Intel CFO has to look at the final frames, a very similar but much faster step than seen from 22 nm to 14 nm first generation.

So even though everything is going on, there will be a new 10 nm + and 7 nm EUV that will physically restore the complexity of building processors, where not only will it affect the masses, but a higher frequency is expected compared to what we can see at 10 nm.

So, it's clear that we can't expect a frequency near or above 5 GHz, so the performance jump will have to come with improved architecture and IPC, where Intel has already revealed that we will see an 18% correction in the final performance against Kaby Lake, which should translate into 15% against Cofi Lake and we'll see how much impact it has on the fight against Comet Lake.

Leave a Comment