It looks like Intel is quietly delivering the token and that its 10 nm desktop and server are not as far away as expected. At least that's the suite slides Gebenben 4, who has seen how the processor in the processing of the two socks passes through his hands.
Intel would continue to operate at a frequency of 10 nm
We now know that the lithographic process has two completely different features, because one focuses on low consumption and the other on high-performance, high-performance applications. With its Ice Lake-U on the market and coming in with drops of accounts in short supply, the Ice Lake-S can be challenging for Swan.
Sorting reveals a very good configuration, since it looks like a refined processor would have been tested on a two-speed board, so it's thought that we're dealing with Intel Xeon based on a smaller design Ice in the pool.
This is reinforced when we see its DisplayModel: 06_6AH, a program that within Intel's Whipaper itself is described as: Xeon based on Ice Lake. Gebenben refers to the family 6 model 106 with Stepping 0, so we're not dealing with such an ES processor.
The most impressive without a doubt is its wires, because it contains the basis of 2.2 GHz and Growth of 2.69 GHz
New reserve position
Looking at the allocation of reserves we can see that the configuration of the operating companies reveals six key elements, so the frequency information though correct is lessening the glimpses seen on Ice Lake-U. When Intel broke down nanometers it took another generation to increase the frequency and obviously this new mindset wouldn't be the same.
Cache also changes, so unlike the i7-8700K and i5-9600K, we'll see 32 KB on L1I, 48 KB on L1D, 1.25 MB on L2 and 9 MB on L3, being all particles except this which will be shared by all. Geekbench 4 data according to punctuation is not foreign, it can even be described as accurate, because the two processes have 3427 points in one and 27926 points in multicore.
It's a far cry from what the Ryzen 9 3900X can accomplish, though it's true that the ratings don't match the Xeon case. What seems clear is that Intel has much more advanced architecture than one might think, because we're talking, not of desktop processors, but of high-end Intel processors.
At the moment we can only think of frequencies, but what is certain that no 6 processor will arrive on the desktop is powered by 2.7 GHz, so, as its cache distribution is known, the most appropriate question will be At what pace will they arrive?
