It's not easy to see how your competitor is consuming the market a bit, but Intel is based on AMD-only performance. It misses its 10 nm delay, yes, but it's also a Zen 2-like building that has made good use of its competitor.
The fight will arrive in stores in a few weeks and will face two colossies in the emerging market such as gaming laptops, where the 910980HK and the Ryzen 7 4800H will face each other.
Faster, more powerful, but are the winnings priced?
User-filtered information already known as APISAK raises the userbenchmark conflict of interest most with the two fighters currently affecting the fabric. Both of these CPUs contain 8 cores and 16 threads
Intel processor comes with a very high turbo frequency, which will appear in all its cores there 4.5 GHz. His rivals at AMD prefer the same strategy and validate the turbo for 3.9 GHz of all its ancestors, so we talk about the difference of A total of 600 MHz.
Blue reaches 14 nm ++ while the red option does it with the highest quality 7 nm lithographic process. The problem is that for the CPUs available, the previous data (other than lithography) can be completely different depending on the temperature achieved in each model when installed.
The closest difference is between this
What the suite shows leaves us with the following information: 211 points vs 206 points in the general configuration, 797 points vs 722 points in Heavy and 1343 points vs 1273 points in Extreme.
Why a total of 102% vs 95.3% replaces Intel, that is, only AMD Ryzen 7 4800H 6.7% of Intel's beast in the mobile gaming market.
As we have said, we do not know the thermal conditions of both of these materials, but what we do know from previous leaks is that they will both exceed their official TDP and grow it well. In the case of AMD, it will be all around 65 watts
More comparative data can be extracted from these calculations, and with 6% that Intel achieves more, it requires 600 MHz, that is, With the same frequency frequency there will be a technical tire.
To finish and if that's true, Intel won't be crowned for too long, since AMD would have the Ryzen 9 4900H and ASUS the Ryzen 7 4800HS ready, which should only be placed in the same location as the i9-10980HK, at the top. Will those of the Swan lose again in a field where AMD is almost proven?
