If you also wanted to try all the news that yesterday presented in the Google E / S, I have bad news: most are relegated to the largest subscription of Gemini, the Google AI bonus of 250 dollars. It is a huge turning point with regard to the company's strategy, because all the subscribers are becoming second: The last stays in Ultra. OPENAI, on the other hand, imitates its $ 20 subscribers with the last of their models.
If I had to choose a winner with regard to innovation, I would have my doubts between Openai and Google. The first opened the path of chatbots based on long language models, the second showed yesterday that its AI is revolutionary. Closely compared, It seems that Google has taken OpenAi's strategyThis can be seen especially in the new ultra subscription. Too bad everything that must be repaired.
Google has defined in the Chatppt to create an ultra, but bad
Google Image
As yesterday's E / S Google progressed, everything was good news. Improvement of the generation of videos with i route 3, even with audio; Image 4 for the generation of images; Google Beam to make video calls an almost real conversation; Project Mariner as a gemini disguised as an agent with high capacities. And then the cold water jug arrived: a subscription of 250 dollars that takes everything better.
On the one hand, Google has announced and made available to users the vast majority of novelties, it was good; No matter how much is limited to the United States. On the other hand, Google has segmented the plans of the AI to place a much larger roof. Rebounds, it leaves half abandoned to those who hitherto paid AI, as is my case.
Do you want to make videos with audio, try the agent, use the new models almost without limits? Well, it's time to jump from the $ 20 from Google AI Pro (22 dollars in Europe) to 250 Dollars from Google AI Premium. It is a price that only these users will pay They must tighten the AI and are profitableSomething difficult. Because it does not seem to be a professional subscription to use: it is difficult to understand what youtube premium painted in an AI plan. The 30 TB to save the creations again.
Although Google is aimed at professional users with Ultra, includes options that move away from this market, like YouTube Premium
So far, the most recent models, new tools and options have quickly arrived at Gemini Advanced, in the subscription that Yesterday changed his name into pro. Google was not in a hurry, but they arrived. With the emergence of ultra yes, there is an emergency, but only for those who pay more. And that means leaving those who have taken care of Google from the start from the start.
If Google has decided to watch Openai and put a higher roof Give more exclusivity to your productWhy did he not decided to buy the novelty distribution strategy used by the owner of Chatgpt? Paying the most does not give the feeling of abandonment.
OpenAi better democratizes the use of advanced AI
Google and its competitor have a Free chatbot based on recent modelsAlthough cut (and with reduced limits). The two offer a simple plan and, now, a megac-accomic; With reduced limits as it increases in the price. The difference lies in the treatment that Openai and Google give to those who want to pay for a good thing without leaving the budget.
Google AI planes
OPENAI and Google move the newly presented innovations to their payment chatbots, but only OPENAI remembers users: although there is an exclusivity in the 200 dollars pro, Chatgpt Plus does not leave this feeling of restriction which now transmits Ai Pro. The most innovative language models jump in the most, they can create a video with Sora and images with GPT-4O without an exaggerated limit and have other recent advantages. Google has decided to improve Ultra as an act with the most recent, not the most extensive.
Openai increases chatgpt pro as a tool with fewer limits. Google Power AI Ultra as a new door
There is no doubt that Google has revolutionized generative AI, in particular with multimedia content and agents. And it has a huge cost to pay. The problem comes by not giving the opportunity to prove it: if Openai has succeeded, it was able to democratize the best tools of AI, The cost of access to the latter is not too high. And this is precisely the key: offer the best at a price that is not prohibitive.
We will have to see if Google succeeds with the strategy or end up classifying to give more care to the pro. Present so many news and not be able to prove anything even if you pay, it's frustrating.
Cover image |
In Xataka Android | Ten years later, Google finally convinced us that the Android XR and Smart glasses can be the perfect accessory
