If you’ve recently visited the Silent Hill 2 Remastered Wikipedia page and noticed that the review scores seem a bit low, that’s because someone has tampered with them.
Despite the difficulties, reviews for Silent Hill 2 Remastered have been pretty good. A lot of people are surprised by this fact, including some critics, but you see, if a game is good, it’s a good game. I haven’t had a chance to try it out myself yet, so I can’t give you my opinion, but there are clearly some people who are eager to have their input shown. As spotted by Eurogamer , it seems that someone (or maybe someone) was editing the Wikipedia page for Silent Hill 2 Remastered, giving the game an incredibly low rating – there’s no place to give the game a zero points, friends—but it’s not yet clear why.
Seriously? Trolls can’t handle SH2R’s success, so they ruin Wikipedia’s comment scores
byu/Sea-Measurement5025 Silent Mountain
iGamesNews
You may quickly notice that in the Reddit thread about the above change, iGamesNews’s review is listed as a 0/5, but unless Kelsey secretly changed their score without telling anyone, I I can tell you now that they gave the game their top score in the review, a 5/5, which is much better than a 0/5 as long as my math is correct. I won’t go on with this sarcasm, but the rest of the review scores are about the same. The issue got so out of hand that some Wikipedia administrators had to lock the page to prevent people from messing with it, and as it stands, all scores are at the correct numbers.
iGamesNews
Look, it’s okay to not be interested in playing a game or have some reservations (I have some reservations too), but if those reasons lead to someone easily calling you a “dumb” and needing to quit the game without hesitation, maybe you do need to Logout.
