Overwatch 2: What players don’t like

Gaming News Overwatch 2: What players don’t like

The death of loot boxes and the arrival of the Battle Pass

Uh yes! Say goodbye to loot boxes and player levels. In the first Overwatch, it was possible to unlock a whole range of cosmetics, such as skins or tags, simply by leveling up. By completing matches, players leveled up and received a loot box as a reward. This mechanism made it possible to have some more or less rare virtual decorations without having to pay real money. They could also purchase multiple loot boxes at full price if they were impatient. All of this is a time that has finally come to an end since the introduction of Overwatch’s second name. The Battle Pass came, as did a sense of emptiness that quickly settled in players’ hearts.. Player tiers are now Battle Pass tiers. There is a free path and a paid path that includes many more items. Players quickly realized that it took a lot of play to progress in the Battle Pass. As the icing on the cake, Blizzard announced that not all characters will be automatically accessible, but only after a certain level.. This is the case of Kiriko, who must be unlocked from level 55 (except players with Overwatch 1, they can only play her in competitive mode before level 55). A fun idea that players don’t approve of at all. The level progression is way too slow, even by chaining the pieces. Is that the opposite of going free-to-play? Couldn’t Blizzard have done better even for free-to-play? In any case, this choice is very controversial and does not seem to reassure players about the future of the game.

The disappearance of level progression has also left a huge void for some. It was possible to level up in just a few games and see your player portrait evolve over time. Beyond the aesthetic aspect, there was a real sense of satisfaction. Now progression is tied to Battle Passes and is slow. For many, it was levels and loot boxes that drew players into playing games. The greed of this new opus no longer has as much interest as the previous configuration.

The new 5v5 team setup and feel

Going from a 6-player team to a 5-player team wasn’t trivial for Blizzard. They wanted to make games less “boring” by removing a tank. In her opinion, now with 5 players, it’s easier for everyone to contribute effectively. Such a change is not without consequences… All the old characters had to be rebalanced to be usable in this new configuration.. Balancing is always a complex matter in a multiplayer title… So in the current meta, it’s not uncommon for the same heroes to be played and repeated, or for a player to be forced to switch characters for something more unanimously “viable”. ” to play.. For many, this contradicts what Blizzard did with the first game. They had emphasized character exploration…. Maybe that was only true when players were still discovering the game in 2016.

Tanks, or rather team tanks, have a very delicate place now. They get overwhelmed more easily, but are meant to be more aggressive, like damage heroes. Many players have expressed their dissatisfaction by saying that this eliminates the strategic aspect of this FPS in favor of a game in which the heroes’ abilities fly in all directions without really asking for organization. Some wonder if it’s a role that still has value in this new opus. The only tank on a team increases the pressure on the player. The previous plant’s off-tank position provided significant support for the main tank. Some tanks may be offended for not using the most optimized character since the game’s release.Amazing decision by the North American company that aims to reduce toxicity at all costs. Many players hope for a strategic improvement to promote and showcase the diversity of tank heroes.

Details that make gamers’ hair stand on end

In the first game, if a player did a really good execution streak, their portrait would burn and all other players could see it. An item called “On Fire” that gave players’ games a boost by rewarding them for their impressive performances. It wasn’t just about showing off, but above all about assessing your own level according to the criteria set in the game.. In Overwatch 2, the Burning Portrait was removed much to the chagrin of players. Well… not quite remotely, as your character will always exclaim that he’s on fire without showing it on screen. Even in PvP performances, the scoreboard is no longer visible after a game. It’s impossible to know if you’ve made a quantified achievement without having had the action of the game. The first game featured a table full of medals that gave an idea of ​​the level of players in certain categories. Now endgames feel empty… like something is missing to turn your game into blood and sweat. Added to this is a sound quality that some users have found to be poor, especially with the sounds of certain weapons that seem less real. The game’s new menu was also criticized for being less ergonomic than before.

The magic of Overwatch seems a long way off. Many players felt this second opus was a clumsy step towards free-to-play, as if the marketing and the whole lucrative aspect overwhelmed the players. Without the yet-to-be-released PVE that gives that half-game feel, it’s like Overwatch 2 is just the first work, just not as good. That’s the dark observation of the license’s fans, who are voicing their disappointment en masse. Fortunately, Blizzard has announced that changes are expected over time that will make the gaming experience even more enjoyable. So there is hope for this famous FPS! With a little patience, fans might discover this second opus in a new light!

What do you think ? Do you have any hope that the game will get better over time?