Performance comparison
There is a comparison video online that shows the obvious shortcomings of the Samsung Galaxy S20 in the Exynos 990 version. The Snapdragon 865-equipped version is not only faster, but literally means to stay calm.
Compared to the Snapdragon 865, the Samsung Galaxy S20 with Exynos 990 has a clear disadvantage. [Source: netzwelt]
In Europe, the Samsung Galaxy S20 uses the internal processor Exynos 990 in all variants, which is generally considered to be slower and more power hungry than the Snapdragon 865 processor used in most countries around the world. A comparison video on the web now shows why fans started opposing petitions for Samsung Exynos smartphones, which compared the two Galaxy S20 models with the mentioned processors. The results are very clear.
There, YouTuber ran the Manhattan 3.1 battery benchmark on both versions of the Samsung Galaxy S20 + at the same time, and it ran accurately for 30 minutes. The version with Exynos 990 warms up to 5 degrees Celsius on average. The result is a significant decrease in performance during the test. Although the Exynos processor cannot manage more than 15 frames per second, the Snapdragon 865 reaches speeds between 30 and 40 frames per second until the end.
The Snapdragon variant of the Galaxy S20 + stays much cooler. As a result, the chipset has fewer throttles and then maintains the speed uniformly at one level. On the other hand, the Exynos 990 will crash completely several times, eventually failing to maintain half of its actual clock frequency. You may also feel a sharp drop in performance during the game.
In terms of performance, Galaxy phones vary widely. Fans have complained about the Exynos version, but the image processor is also poor, as can be seen from the above petition. The battery performance is not as good as the Snapdragon 865 processor. When and if Samsung plans to use smartphones with Snapdragon chipsets in Europe.
