A few days ago, we met news on Meta This indicated how the company had used content protected by copyright illegally, a total of 82 TB of content with which they fed their call models. Now, after having known the facts and being in the midst of a trial to piracy The company guarantees that its actions were legal when they try to minimize the risks of being shared, not to avoid it completely.
Piracy is one of the actions that most companies complain the most, because it largely reduces their income, but the problem is that some of the large companies that have tried to carry out which they have ever used their resources illegally does not escape illegally. All this was aggravated by the arrival of artificial intelligence, some of the big brands have undergone complaints because they use content made illegally to develop their artificial intelligences, which we saw by Openai, Microsoft and now the company behind Facebook, objective.
Hacking, the new problem facing
More and more companies that use practices that are not too legal to develop their new technologies, in the case of the meta, this is quite worrying because it is not something that has affected to a lesser extent , because we speak they used 82 TB of CONTENT protected For copyright downloaded via Torrent. This sharing system uses a method called “sowing” in which a file with other users is shared during or after download.
One of the allegations that the company has made to try to defend itself against the complaint implies that there is no problem to download and use these contents when the precautions are taken so as not to share them because the employees have taken the necessary precautions so that this does not happen. The objective is now to hang on to a fairly simple defense, trying to demonstrate that there is no evidence that there was a “sowing”, Michael Clark, manager of the management objective Project, said that the configuration parameters they used largely.
In this case, the declaration refers to the fact that they have not prevented it at all from preventing it, but that is not all, because apparently, an internal message from one of the target researchers indicates that the Company would have tried to hide the broadcasting of its servers to avoid the risk of following the contents of Facebook servers. In this case, the company has not yet responded to allegations as to whether it knew it shared data during the download process, also trying to concentrate its defense on which they did as much as possible for the 'Avoid, although it is clear that they should not be unpunished after download 82 TB of illegally acquired content.
