When we see the presentation of a completely new component, there are many moments in which we can observe how the brands ensure that compared to those of the competition they are much better in all aspects. But then when we get to try and use them for the first time we realize that the difference really isn't that big in most cases, what makes the improvement they offer is half the truth , because it can increase the performancebut not in the way we expect, and that has to do with how these are tested Components has PCsince they do not show what they offer in a way real.
One of the IT industry's biggest dilemmas has to do with its own material of PCIn general we can find many situations in which a component may seem extremely good, but that when we buy it and install it on our computer it is not the same thing as it was sold to us. Especially large companies have a series of marketing strategies that allow them to offer true data, but which are not taken in a real situation, but in a scenario prepared so that it obviously exceeds what we expect.
The reason this happens: unrealistic testing situations
As with everything we can find on the market, many situations that we find when presenting a product largely hide the defects that they may have, which is obvious if what the companies are looking for is to sell as much of units. But in addition to completely eliminating any issues that may exist from the equation, brands generally add an extra layer comparing their products to those of a previous generation or directly to those of the competition.
The problem is that the comparison is usually carried out in perfectly optimized systems, with all the necessary parameters so that it can obtain the best possible data, carrying out several tests and obviously avoiding with which they have a superior difference compared to others. This is quite common because as we know not all systems work the same, we can see that one configuration may have a higher score in the synthetic benchmarks against another that is practically equal only because it is perfectly optimized and configured.
That is why most of the time we should not be guided only by the tests that are carried out in this way, because the best way to know how a component works, for example for gaming, is to check the tests that have been carried out on a basic configuration without optimizing and on a realistic application, because synthetic benchmarks can be something that allows us to know broadly the differences between several different models, but if we want to know how they really work we will have to look for evidence that uses evidence that uses Real situations as they are a series of tests on several games.
